,

The Battle Between Science and Prohibitionists

Posted by

David Morrison argues on his blog that current medical evidence does not support the claim that moderate wine consumption is harmful, though public health messaging has increasingly taken a prohibitionist stance. He critiques official health organisations, such as the WHO and the UK Chief Medical Officers, for their stringent guidelines on alcohol, pointing out a lack of solid scientific evidence to justify their warnings.

Morrison, a seasoned scientist with extensive research credentials, states that moderate wine consumption, defined as up to two glasses per day for men and one for women, poses no harm according to recent studies. He references research suggesting that moderate wine intake may even confer health benefits, such as reduced cardiovascular risk when paired with a Mediterranean diet.

He challenges the growing anti-alcohol rhetoric, suggesting it disregards the nuanced understanding of wine’s role in culture and personal enjoyment. While advocating against excessive drinking, Morrison stresses the importance of recognising wine’s value as more than just a potential health risk, arguing it is part of a rich cultural and social tradition.